Monday, July 27, 2009

SEBI issues clarifications on insider trading amendments

A brief history

Earlier, SEBI had amended certain provisions of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992 vide notification dated November 19, 2008 (covered in this blog here). One of the major changes it introduced was that the directors/officers/designated employees, who buy or sell shares, cannot carry out a reverse transaction for six months. In the case of subscription in the primary market (initial public offers), the above mentioned entities should hold their investments for a minimum period of 30 days. The holding period would commence when the securities are actually allotted. Earlier there existed no restriction on entering into an opposite transaction in six months. The only restriction, which existed before, required that the security should be held for a minimum period of 30 days. This amendment tried to introduce the “Short-Swing Profit Rule” in India. SEC’s “Short-Swing Profit Rule” requires company insiders to return any profits made from the purchase and sale of company stock if both transactions occur within a six-month period. In India, as per the terms of the present amendment, the insider is not required to return profits to company but it just prohibit such transactions.  

The Clarifications

SEBI had received a few queries on the amended regulations and it has now issued clarifications in form of an FAQ. They are as follows: -

1. Does the six month restriction also apply to the exercise of ESOPs and the sale of shares received?

2. If an employee has sold shares on 10th February 2009, can he subscribe to ESOPs on 11th March 2009?


Clarification: Restriction in Clause 4.2 is intended for transactions in the secondary market and hence is not applicable for the exercise of ESOPs and sale of these shares. In the above example, the employee can subscribe to the ESPOs even if he has sold shares during the previous six months. However, it may be noted that once shares acquired through ESOPs are sold in the market, the restriction on buying would become applicable for next six months. Also, while exercising ESOPs, the code of conduct framed by the company and the fundamental principles for prohibition of insider trading as specified in the Regulations must be complied with.

 
3. If an employee has purchased 100 shares on 1st February 2009 and then again purchased 400 shares on 15th March 2009, when will he be able to sell the shares purchased on 1st February 2009? Will it be after 1st August or 15th September?

Clarification:
The restriction of six months on sale of shares would apply from the date of the last purchase and not the first purchase. In the above example he can sell the shares after 15th September. The same is true in case of sale of shares on two different dates i.e. the restriction of six months on purchase of shares would apply from the date of the last sale.

 
4. The clause 4.2 stipulates that, no opposite transaction can be entered into for a period of 6 months from the date of prior transaction by a designated employee. Whether the same shall be applicable for shares held on the date of the notification. For example, a designated person has purchased 100 shares on 01.11.2008. Can he sell these shares on 22.12.2008?

Clarification:
As the shares were acquired before the amendments to the Regulations were notified, the designated person may be allowed to sell the shares if it is permitted under the code of conduct of the company 

 
5. Clause 4.2 of Part A, Schedule I of the Regulations, provides for holding period of 30 days in case of acquiring shares through IPO. Can the company apply the minimum holding period of 30 days as applicable to IPOs even for bonus issues, ESOPs, rights issues etc.?

Clarification:
Under the existing Regulations, 30 day holding period restriction is applicable for IPOs. In case of issues as referred to above, the company may decide about the holding period as specified in its code of conduct.

 
6. Clause 4.3 of Part A, Schedule I of the Regulations provides that in case the sale of securities is necessitated by personal emergency, the holding period may be waived by the compliance officer after recording in writing his / her reasons in this regard. Can the Compliance Officer extend the waiver clause to the restrictions on opposite transactions?

Clarification:
Yes. The waiver may be applied for sale of shares by personal emergencies after recording the reasons in writing and ensuring that there is no element of insider trading.


7. Can a designated employee continue to deal in NIFTY / SENSEX index futures?

Clarification:
There is no restriction under the Regulations for dealing in NIFTY / SENSEX index futures by the designated employees subject to their compliance of code of conduct.


8. For a designated employee already holding derivative positions in the company’s shares, is it required for them to liquidate the positions before maturity or it necessary to hold till maturity?

Clarification:
As the position in derivatives was taken before the notification of Regulations, the company may take a view about liquidating the derivative position or holding it till maturity.

A copy of the communication from SEBI is available here.



Tuesday, July 21, 2009

SEBI amends listing agreement – Listing companies prohibited from issuing shares with superior rights

SEBI vide its Circular SEBI/CFD/DIL/LA/2/2009/21/7 dated July 21, 2009 has amended the Equity Listing Agreement to prohibit listed companies from issuing shares with superior rights as to voting or dividend vis-à-vis the rights on equity shares that are already listed. This amendment gives effect to an important decision taken by the SEBI Board on June 18, 2009. A new clause 28A has been inserted in the equity listing agreement to this effect.

A copy of the Circular is available here.

SEBI abolishes no-delivery period for all types of corporate actions

SEBI vide its Circular MRD/DoP/SE/Cir-07/2009 dated July 21, 2009 has abolished ‘no-delivery period’ for all types of corporate actions in respect of the scrips which are traded in the compulsory dematerialized mode. Accordingly, short deliveries, if any, of the shares traded on cum-basis should be directly closed out. In case of such direct close-out, the mark-up price would be as stated in SEBI Circular no. SMD/POLICY/Cir-08/2002 dated April 16, 2002. 

A copy of the Circular is available here.

Monday, July 13, 2009

SEBI amends DIP Guidelines

SEBI vide its Circular SEBI/CFD/DIL/DIP/36/2009/09/07 dated July 9,2009 has amended the SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000. These amendments give effect to important decisions taken by the SEBI Board on June 18, 2009, including the introduction of 'Anchor Investor' in public issue. The key amendments are summarised below: -

  1. An unlisted company making an IPO should compulsorily list its securities on at least one stock exchange having nationwide trading terminals (i.e. BSE or NSE)
  2. Concept of 'Anchor Investor' is introduced in public issues through book building. Keys points in relation to 'Anchor Investor' concept are as follows: -  
  • 30% of QIP reservation may be allocated to Anchor Investors
  • The minimum application size - Rs.10 crores. 25 % payable on application – balance within 2 day of closure of issue
  • If price determined in IPO is greater than the price paid by AI, AI will be required to pay the difference to the company
  • One-third of the Anchor Investor portion shall be reserved for domestic mutual funds
  • Bidding for to open one day before the issue opens and shall be completed on the same day.
  • Allocation to Anchor Investors - minimum 2 investors for upto Rs.250 crs. and 5 for more than Rs.250 crores
  • Shares shall be in a lock-in of 30 days from the date of allotment in the public issue

A copy of the Circular is available here.

A copy of the amended SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 is available here.


Saturday, July 4, 2009

Sebi asks for firm commitment from foreign venture capital investors

SEBI vide its Circular IMD/DOF-1/FVCI/CIR. No. 1/2009 dated July 3, 2009 has made it mandatory for foreign venture capital investors (FCVI) to obtain a firm commitment from their investors for contribution of at least $1 million (about Rs 5 crore) for registration with the market regulator.

With the change in the legal framework of SEBI (Foreign Venture Capital Investors) Regulations, 2000, the regulator has now brought about parity between FVCIs and domestic venture capital funds (VCF). 

A copy of the Circular is available here.